More Benghazi

Gregory Hicks, the former State Department deputy chief of mission and chargé d’affairs who was in Libya at the time of the attack, attorney Victoria Toensing charged the Accountability Review Board, or ARB, headed by Ambassador Thomas Pickering and Admiral Michael Mullen, was a cover-up designed to contain blame for the Benghazi terror attack at a level below Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the State Department.

On page 34 of its unclassified final report, the ARB stated: “The Ambassador chose to travel to Benghazi that week, independent of Washington, as per standard practice.”

This, Toensing charged, is a complete misrepresentation of the truth despite the attempt of her client, Gregory Hicks, to explain in his testimony to the ARB that Stevens went to Benghazi on Clinton’s specific and go to Benghazi before Sept. 30, 2012, to establish Benghazi as a permanent State Department facility.  Stevens was running out of time to comply with ‘Killer’s’ request.

So, we have lost Petraeus and replaced him with an apparently dishonorable sack-of-shit in Admiral Mullet Mullen? 

“At least one of the reasons Ambassador Stevens was in Benghazi was to further the Secretary of Death’s wish that that post become a permanent constituent post and that he was also there because we understood the Secretary intended to visit Tripoli later in the year,” Hicks reiterated. “We hoped that she would be able to announce to the Libyan people the establishment of a permanent constituent post in Benghazi at that time.”

Hicks emphasized that the State Department was aware of increased risks posed by Islamic extremists in eastern Libya and that Stevens was aware the Benghazi compound did not meet State Department security requirements.

Still, despite the security risk, Stevens was determined to comply with Clinton’s wishes to visit Benghazi prior to her planned visit to Libya.

“The ARB (with Admiral Mullet) unclassified final report was incomplete in that the reason for Stevens being in Benghazi was known to Hicks, but the ARB ignored the testimony Hicks gave on this point,” Toensing said.

Hicks elaborated on this point by commenting to the House oversight committee that when he told the ARB the reason Stevens went to Benghazi, Ambassador Pickering looked visibly upset and asked,

“Does the 7th Floor [where the office of Secretary of State Clinton is located] know about this?”

Toensing also explained no stenographer was present at the ARB to record the testimony of witnesses, so no verbatim transcript could be made of each witness testimony; instead, the ARB took merely took notes of witness testimony.

She further objected the ARB never permitted Hicks to review the notes regarding his testimony so he could suggest corrections and point out any omissions; nor did the ARB allow Hicks to review the notes taken of his testimony and sign off on their accuracy.

“Everybody is missing that the ARB is a big story here,” Toensing said, explaining she was turned down or canceled on more than one network television interview, including administration lapdogs, ABC and CNN, when producers learned she wanted to expose ARB deficiencies.

“The ARB not only omitted the reason Stevens went to Benghazi, when my client had explained to the ARB the reasons, the ARB actually put in a false statement regarding why Stevens was there the night of the attack.”

Toward the conclusion of the House hearing on May 8, Hicks and Eric Nordsrtom, the State Department regional security officer in Libya during the attack, both argued the ARB had assigned blame for the Benghazi tragedy to lower-level State Department officers when they realized Secretary (Killer) Clinton was fully involved in the decision to send Stevens to Benghazi despite the security concerns.

“The most obvious deficiency in the ARB report was Secretary Clinton was never interviewed for the investigation,” Toensing said.

In an editorial, Toensing wrote on May 12, she elaborated on this point: 

“She [Clinton] is mentioned only once in the [ARB] report, as the person who convened the Board.  If, as Clinton herself has said, she took full responsibility for what happened in Benghazi, her decisions and decision-making process are materially relevant for investigating what happened before and during the night of September 11, 2012, and preventing what went wrong from ever happening again.”

But as Killer has stated, “What difference does it make now?” 

What difference does it make if she is a lying piece of shit?  What difference does it make if Americans died and could have been saved had the acting POTUS not been asleep, and the Secretary drunk?  What difference does it make if they both are covering all of this up?  What difference indeed…

 

Revolution coming?

Locke called it the ‘federative power’ of the executive branch. The power to wage war, for instance. While he believed that not every possible situation could have Constitutional laws set aside, calling for a specific action, and that the executive must rule with wisdom & prudence, he very much believed in the primacy of the legislative branch, and that the executive branch is ministerial and submissive to the legislative branch.

But when the executive is out-of-control, or a tyrannical power (like we have today), he asked, “who can judge?” (the executive). He said that all the people can do, at that point, is to ‘appeal to heaven’.

What did he mean?

When the social trust has been dissolved, as our government is doing today, the people have a right and duty to:

Revolution!

According to John Locke, it will not be a matter of a financial collapse, or the unrestrained corruption of banks, corporations, and crooked politicians.  It will be the dissolution of the public’s trust that will create such an atmosphere, and result in the overthrow of such a corrupted system.  According to Locke, this country should expect such a solution, and it is coming to us even now.

 

More Locke

According to John Locke, man’s main purpose for forming commonwealths, is in order to protect property.  All laws and regulations of the commonwealth (federal government) are based on the main principle of preserving property.

The state is thus limited in that it cannot take a man’s property away from him. If he has consented to the contract necessary to live in the state, his property is thusly protected by its laws. The only way a man’s property can be taken away is if he breaks his end of the contract and is therefore no longer under contract.

I did not agree to the establishment of any government agency that can accumulate (or manufacture) data, based on my religious or political beliefs for use against me.  I do not submit to any authority, established by man elected, which assumes the power to arbitrarily seize property.  Neither do I recognize by contract, any branch, sect, or agency, which pretends to hold powers given to it by my government, which enables it to take property or liberty, that is not equally applied to every participant of our social compact. 

The IRS must be dismantled completely.  Those who have overseen the abuse of power must be charged and tried by a just jury of their peers.

Learn Locke: an excellent dissertation.  Go to the 24.35 mark, if you cannot sit still, to discover Rawls and the basis of ‘the Kenyan’s’ (and his colleague’s) mentality.

Locke’s Second Treatise (13-19)

 

Why it’s too late

Take a look at the bozo who saved the girls in Cleveland.  Specifically, take notice of the neighbors.

When you look at these people with a keen eye, you will notice that they are all exactly alike.  Uneducated, unemployed or low wage earners (for the most part), classless government wards.  Notice their appearances, dialects, and mentalities.  Do you think that any of these people know what a Constitution, Bill of Rights, or even Liberty really is?  Do you suppose they even know who we declared our independence from?  Do you suppose they care?

Is this is the norm in Northern States and Cities?  When the masses are comprised of this class of citizen, to the extent that we witness, one must conclude that this nation is doomed to a meager existence, consisting of enclaves and safe zones.  One of perpetual conflict in an effort to eradicate itself from these human scavengers.  And the press considers this man to be a hero.

 

Hussein releases prisoners

Iraq admits hundreds with criminal records released

Today, Saddam Hussein released criminal prisoners.  In the face of a mounting U.S. attack, he has decided to empty his jails.  He does so in an attempt to wreak as much havoc against his people as possible, while attempting to garner international support.

There is no indications whether any of the 600 Kuwaitis – missing since 1991 and alleged by Kuwait to be still being held in Iraq as prisoners of war – are among those released on Sunday.

Iraq says it has lost track of those prisoners.  Read more here.

Stop  ~ Wrong Hussein ~ Stop

ICE admits hundreds of illegal immigrants with criminal records released

 

In the face of a mounting attacks against his administration for incompetence, general misconduct, and possible treason, Hussein Obama has decided to empty his jails.  He does so in an attempt to wreak as much havoc against his people as possible, while attempting to garner international support from Mexico.

Those detainees released were still said to face deportation and be under supervision. But administration officials downplayed the threat they might pose after leaving the local immigration jails. In late February, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said:

.

“As ICE made clear yesterday, the agency released these low-risk, non-criminal detainees under a less expensive form of monitoring to ensure detention levels stayed within ICE’s overall budget.”

Read more here.

 

IRS Lady

Now, on to the next scandal…

“I’m not good at math” ?

(at the 3:15 mark)

WTF!

Now, we hear that the clown in charge is still an ‘acting’ head, and was due to resign from his post in early June anyway!  If this proves to be true:

IMPEACH THE BASTARD!

 

Thank you, General Petraeus!

White House releases trove of Benghazi documents

Finally!  The good General showed up (if only by courier) to arrange for this criminal cartel to come clean on Benghazi.  Does anyone really think they are doing this out of an abundance of guilt, or something like National Interest, or say like preventing it from occurring again? 

Threats, as the Kenyan is discovering, can cut both ways.

Thanks again!

 

A Bitter President?

Is this man just a bitter anti-American, Kenyan immigrant?

Or is there more to it?  Right now there are three scandals headed for Congressional hearings, and they all have to do with thuggery and intimidation tactics on the part of Federal Government bureaucrats.

1. IRS Targeting of individuals  (Thuggery/Intimidation)
2. Benghazi (Gun running/Foreign Policy)
3. Arab Spring (Foreign Policy)
   
4. Muslim Brotherhood (Foreign Policy)
   
5. Afghanistan (Drug running)
   
6. Food Stamps (Alinsky)
7. Disability (Alinsky)
8. Immigration reform (Voting manipulation)
   
9. Iran (Foreign Policy)
   
10. Israel (Foreign Policy)
    
11. Union favoritism (Thuggery/Corruption/Intimidation)
12. Racism (Alinsky)
13. Corrupt Attorney General
    
14. Green energy giveaways (Corruption)
15. No Budget
    
16. Record National Debt
17. Quantative easing (devaluation of money)
18. Obamacare (Premiums to increase up to 415%)
19. Assault on the family (Alinsky)
    
20. Gun Control (Constitution)
    
21. Voter Fraud (Voter manipulation)
    
22. Fast & Furious (Constitution)
    
23. AP Wiretapping  (Thuggery/Intimidation)
24. Lies
    
25. Coverups/Non-transparency
26. Internet Controls & Taxation (Thuggery/Intimidation/Constitution)
    
27. Keystone Pipeline denial (Thuggery/Corruption/Intimidation)
    
28. GM Bailout (see Union favoritism)
    
29. BP Oil Spill Settlement (Corruption)
    
30. Protection and special protection for Muslims (Alinsky)
    
31. Assault on Christianity (Alinsky)
32. Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services illegal extorsion of health care and pharmaceutical providers  (Thuggery/Intimidation)

Did I omit anything?

This man is assaulting the American landscape on every level.  He has/is trashed the Constitution in just about every manner possible.  He is operating straight from another Community Organizer, Saul Alinsky, and his book, Rules for Radicals, whose dedication on the opening pages states,

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history… the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”

How much more will the people take?

Yet, there is still no Petraeus coming forth to connect the dots on Benghazi for us.  Where is this ‘honorable’ man?

 

Petraeus

Where is he?

     The once proud leader of men.         A man of impeccable integrity.  

 

While Hillary (the ‘Killer’) Clinton was dancing and drinking up a storm (confident in her plans and

 

ability to pull off more gun running into another sovereign country), playing her ‘waiting game’, Petraeus was being set up over a silly sex allegation.  The die had already been cast.  The Kenyan knew that Petraeus would have to go, and plans were under way to take him out. 

Now that people have died as a result of Hillary’s (more dead bodies) best efforts, and whistle-blowers are testifying in spite of being threatened, Petraeus has disappeared. 

Was he a part of this scheme, or has he been threatened as well, and is simply afraid? 

Wasn’t it ‘the Killer’ who named him in the first place?

          General Betray us.

 

Overthrow! The Press?

In a letter dated January 28, 1776, Thomas Jefferson wrote to the Virginia physician James Currie that

“our liberty depends upon the freedom of the press and that cannot be limited without being lost.”

Throughout the years, many people from many backgrounds have spoken and written on the importance of a free press in keeping alive any Democracy.  In a Representative Republic, such as the United States, it is even more important.  We know that Democracies cannot help but consume themselves and were despised by our founding fathers.  Yet, that is precisely what we have become.  A dreaded Democracy.  Even so, there are any number of reasons why a free press is still so critical to this nation.  Among these are that it not only serves to inform, but it is a fundamental human right.  It sheds light where darkness resides; it is an essential part of democracy; and it also plays a pivotal role in development. The important aspect here is that a free press is a human right.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted in 1948 states:

“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers.”

Independent news media provides the open source material for the public to make informed decisions. Where darkness resides, such as government corruption and abuse, the media has an important role to shed light upon it and bring it into the public domain.

The Press in the United States, specifically what we have come to know as the Mainstream Media, is now serving the forces of darkness.  It serves no other purpose than to spread darkness.  Not light.  It must be stopped, and replaced with an transparent, unbiased, and independent press.  This must become a priority in any new/old system we bequeath for ourselves.

CBS, ABC and CNN executives helping Obama on Benghazi.

CBS News President David Rhodes: Brother (Ben Rhodes) is Obama Deputy National Security Advisor.  Instrumental in re-writing (inventing) the Benghazi talking points about the monkey worshiping slander video.

ABC President Ben Sherwood: Sister, Dr. Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, is a Special Assistant to the Kenyan, Barack Obama, on national security affairs.

CNN’s deputy bureau chief, Virginia Moseley: Wife of Tom Nides, who was Hillary (the Killer) Clinton’s deputy.

There are more.  Click on the link above and become familiar with the facts, while you still can.

Now, the Kenyan is holding private (secret) meetings with many of these same people, or their proxies.  But will these Criminals (with their names in bold and underlined) as a result of their corruptness, be hung, shot, or guillotined someday soon?  Are their names and photographs being put on paper for wanted posters?  Should the time and need arise, will these be ready for circulation?  (Bush did it with a deck of cards.)  For surely these individuals will have to be rounded up to assure they are taken off of the streets and no longer can present a harm to the people of this nation.  A Free Press, like our (slightly amended) re-affirmed Constitution and Bill of Rights, is a must.  It will be, as Ford puts it, Job #1.

Meanwhile, we can overthrow them by our complaints, viewership, pocketbooks, and minds.  Make them bleed.  Hold them accountable.