More Questions

18 Oct

On the day that Mitt Romney was declared the Republican nominee for the President of these United States of America, he became eligible to receive intelligence briefings.  The former Massachusetts governor did not even have to request the weekly briefings.  They are customary for major-party candidates after their nominating conventions.

Why, then, did the Obama administration not provide the candidate with the intel briefings until Sept. 17, or why was there just limited intelligence information related to the anticipated attack on our consulate in Benghazi being provided to the Republican candidate?  We have been told that the Kenyan does not regularly attend briefings on our nation’s security issues around the world, nor does he even take the time to review the information provided by those briefings. 

“The Government Accountability Institute examined President Obama’s schedule from the day he took office until mid-June 2012, to see how often he attended his Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) — the meeting at which he is briefed on the most critical intelligence threats to the country. During his first 1,225 days in office, Obama attended his PDB just 536 times — or 43.8 percent of the time,”

Was his administration, then, withholding or limiting critical information so that Romney wouldn’t know the real truth behind the Benghazi attacks, until it was already old news?

The Kenyan’s people had to know that John Bolton has too many friends inside, who will tell him when Romney is being played.  Nobody would be surprised if Romney knew the truth about Libya prior to his statement.  However, from the Obama camp’s point of view, cutting Romney out of the briefings would keep him from knowing what’s really going on, and therefore the Kenyan could then try to make him look “clueless” on foreign policy issues.

If, on the other hand, Romney was provided with the information, it raises the question whether his campaign has intentionally refused to reveal what he knew or when he knew it.  Could it be that Romney has intentionally withheld this information out of respect for the Office of the President, or has he intentionally “laid off” of the Kenyan in order to maintain the appearance (before the rest of the world) that our country is in somewhat capable hands?  When, in fact, it is being mis-managed by a complete moron?  Did Romney know that this President had completely failed our Ambassador and his aides, and does he KNOW that Obama is directly responsible for the deaths of those four brave souls?  Is this what was actually behind the Kenyan’s lackluster appearance in Debate #1?  Even the national media, as corrupt as it is, stated that he appeared to be preoccupied by ‘something’.  Was this it?  Did our State Department set up this attack?  Is this what had Obama distracted?  Is the Kenyan afraid that Romney has proof of this and about to use against him?  Is he afraid of being knocked out?


Posted by on October 18, 2012 in Uncategorized


4 responses to “More Questions

  1. Wildflower

    October 19, 2012 at 12:34 am

    those briefings? or “the morning report”

    when bush jr was in the white houise, his daddy got those briefings/reports at least two hours before junior did

    carter had sometimes trouble finding the daily reports or even whom was to give him briefings

    ironically same dept was given raises when regan took over; but it was bush sr whom got the reports first/ or the briefings before regan

    whom gets to see these reports or gets briefings can be “interresting” yes?

    • The Soffitrat

      October 19, 2012 at 3:38 pm


      • Wildflower

        October 20, 2012 at 4:07 pm

        so whom briefs you on what to write about?

        • The Soffitrat

          October 20, 2012 at 6:59 pm

          Diogenes! Not. Seriously, topics range from anything that pisses me off, to other things that just perk my interest. Sources vary from normal media to personal contacts. Some things might range into the inside information category! Like the pipeline, or the names of encrypted Marxists who are guising themselves as ethical environmentalists but are responsible for many deaths.


What are you thinking?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: